ZIP: 248
Title: Extensible Transaction Format
Owners: Jack Grigg <thestr4d@gmail.com>
        Kris Nuttycombe <kris@nutty.land>
        Daira-Emma Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
        Schell Scivally <efsubenovex@gmail.com>
Status: Draft
Category: Consensus / Wallet
Created: 2025-12-17
License: MIT
Discussions-To: <https://github.com/zcash/zips/pull/1163>
Pull-Request: <https://github.com/zcash/zips/pull/1156>

Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 1 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals.

The character § is used when referring to sections of the Zcash Protocol Specification. 2

The terms "Mainnet" and "Testnet" are to be interpreted as described in § 3.12 ‘Mainnet and Testnet’. 4

The term "full validator" in this document is to be interpreted as defined in § 3.3 ‘The Block Chain’. 3

The terms "Orchard protocol", "Orchard pool", and "Ironwood pool" are to be interpreted as described in ZIP 229. 10 Following the convention in the Zcash Protocol Specification, slanted text refers to pool names, to distinguish them from shielded protocols.

The terms below are to be interpreted as follows:

V7 transaction format
The transaction format defined by this ZIP, identified by transaction version 7. Its version group ID is not yet assigned.
V7 transaction
A transaction that is encoded using the V7 transaction format.
pre-V7 transaction format
Any transaction format that precedes the V7 transaction format; that is, any of the V1 to V6 transaction formats.
transparent transaction value pool
An ephemeral value for the balance of an asset within the scope of a single transaction, which is modified by additions and subtractions in the processing of the effects of transaction bundles. When all of the effects of a transaction are accounted for, each such balance is zero; i.e., the total of additions to the balance equals the total of subtractions from it.

Abstract

This ZIP proposes an encoding for V7 Zcash transactions that is intended to reduce the impact of future changes to the Zcash transaction format on the Zcash ecosystem. It defines a new typecode-length-value encoding for a sequence of protocol bundles, and a "value balance" map that describes the effect of each bundle on the transparent transaction value pool for each asset. The entries of this map serve the same purpose as the Sapling and Orchard value balance fields have done in the past.

Motivation

In the past, Zcash network upgrades that changed the transaction format have resulted in substantial disruption for wallets and other third-party clients in the Zcash ecosystem. In order to continue functioning after a network upgrade, clients were required to upgrade their Zcash transaction parsers to read the new format, even if the context in which those parsers were being used didn't need or couldn't make use of newly added transaction data. An example of this is that transparent-only wallets were forced to update their parsers to understand the Sapling and Orchard parts of transactions, even if they would never read or act upon those parts. This has led on occasion to significant problems in the Zcash ecosystem, including situations where funds have been locked and rendered unspendable from transparent-only wallets.

For some kinds of changes to consensus features, it's imperative that every wallet be aware of and be adapted to those changes, and in those cases making a major (breaking) transaction version update as we've done in the past is appropriate. For many new features, however, it is possible for a wallet to continue functioning correctly without having to fully understand a transaction using that feature.

For example, if TZEs were to be added to the protocol, it would be possible for wallets to continue operating with transparent/Sapling/Orchard functionality, ignoring TZE parts. There is substantial precedent for this sort of behavior; transparent-only hardware wallets are currently still important in the Zcash ecosystem, and many wallets didn't begin interacting with Orchard transaction parts until quite a while after Orchard activation.

After this change to transaction encoding, wallets and other third parties will not be required to update their transaction parsers in advance of a network upgrade for the introduction of many (and perhaps most) types of new protocol features. This will enable the Zcash ecosystem to make smaller and more incremental network upgrades without breaking existing wallets.

Privacy Implications

This change alters the encoding of transactions, but does not alter the information content of the transaction. As such, the only implication of this change is that the use of this transaction format acts as a 1-bit distinguisher that reveals that the wallet that generated the transaction has been updated to be aware of the new format. This information leakage is unavoidable for any transaction format change.

In the future, this change may reduce the amount of information leakage, since transactions created using the proposed TLV format will include bundles only for those protocols for which the transaction modifies chain state. For example, if this transaction format change is deployed in NU8 and a hypothetical NU9 defines a bundle type for TZE components, it will not be possible for a chain observer to distinguish whether or not the wallet that produced an Orchard-only transaction is one that has been updated to understand the TZE component. Under prior practices for changing the transaction format, this would have been distinguishable.

In summary, this proposal provides a net improvement in user privacy in addition to its other benefits.

Requirements

Non-requirements

Specification

Protocol Bundles

This ZIP refines and codifies the concept of "protocol bundles" that emerged from the implementation of the ZIP 225 9 transaction format. It makes bundles first-class objects and defines a registry of bundle type and variant identifiers. Within the period that a given transaction format version is used on the Zcash network, the semantics of the bundle associated with a given (bundleType, bundleVariant) pair are fixed.

A protocol bundle is a self-contained component of a transaction that implements a specific piece of protocol functionality. Each bundle is identified by a (bundleType, bundleVariant) pair, where:

  • The bundle type identifies the protocol or value pool that the bundle operates on (e.g., Transparent, Sapling, Orchard).
  • The bundle variant identifies a specific variant of that protocol. New variants of an existing bundle type may be introduced by subsequent ZIPs to evolve a protocol's functionality while preserving the association with the same value pool.

A transaction MUST NOT contain more than one variant of any given bundle type. This constraint is enforced by the map structure of the transaction encoding: the maps mEffectBundles, and mAuthBundles are each keyed by bundleType alone; mValuePoolDeltas is keyed by bundle type and asset ID.

Each bundle type/variant pair defines:

  • What effecting data the bundle contains — the data that determines what state changes the bundle produces (e.g., which notes are spent, which outputs are created, which transparent UTXOs are consumed or produced).
  • What authorizing data the bundle contains — the proofs and signatures that authorize the state changes specified by the effecting data.
  • How the bundle affects the transparent transaction value pool — whether the bundle adds value to, removes value from, or has no effect on this ephemeral pool that balances value flows within a transaction.

Rationale for Effecting Data and Authorizing Data

Click to show/hide

The separation of effecting data from authorizing data serves several purposes:

  1. Transaction identifier stability: The transaction identifier (txid) is computed only from the effecting data. This means that the txid is determined by what the transaction does, not by how it is authorized. Third parties cannot change a transaction's identifier by modifying signatures or proofs.
  2. Efficient pruning: Full nodes that have validated a transaction may prune the authorizing data while retaining the effecting data. Since authorizing data appears at the end of the encoded transaction, pruning is simply truncation.
  3. Partial validation: A wallet that does not understand a particular bundle type can still compute the transaction identifier by hashing the effecting data opaquely, without needing to parse its internal structure.

The Transparent Transaction Value Pool

The transparent transaction value pool is an ephemeral concept that exists only within the scope of processing a single transaction. It serves as a balancing mechanism through which value flows between bundles.

Each bundle may contribute a value pool delta — a signed value indicating how much the bundle adds to or removes from the transparent transaction value pool for a given asset. A positive delta means the bundle is adding value to the pool (e.g., a shielded spend releasing value), while a negative delta means the bundle is consuming value from the pool (e.g., a shielded output absorbing value, or a transaction fee).

For a valid transaction, the sum of all value pool deltas for each asset MUST equal zero. This ensures that value is neither created nor destroyed — it is only transferred between bundles within the transaction.

This holds for coinbase transactions as well. The part of the block subsidy that the transaction pays out enters the transparent transaction value pool as the value pool delta of the coinbase bundle, and the fees collected from the other transactions in the block enter it as the value pool delta of the fee bundle; the coinbase outputs then consume that value like any other bundle.

Bundle Type Registration

When a ZIP introduces a new bundle type or a new variant of an existing bundle type, it MUST:

  1. Request allocation of a (bundleType, bundleVariant) pair in the registry defined below. The bundleType and bundleVariant are each non-negative integers. If the ZIP introduces a new bundle type, it requests a new bundleType value with bundleVariant 0. If it introduces a new variant of an existing bundle type, it requests a new bundleVariant value for the existing bundleType.
  2. Specify whether entries for this bundle type are permitted in mValuePoolDeltas (the value pool delta map).
  3. Specify whether entries for this bundle type are permitted in mEffectBundles (the effecting data map).
  4. Specify whether entries for this bundle type are permitted in mAuthBundles (the authorizing data map).
  5. If effecting data is permitted, define the encoding of that data.
  6. If authorizing data is permitted, define the encoding of that data.
  7. Define the digest algorithm for the bundle's contribution to the transaction identifier, if effecting data is present.
  8. Define the digest algorithm for the bundle's contribution to the authorizing data commitment, if authorizing data is present.

A bundle type MUST NOT permit entries in mAuthBundles unless it also permits entries in mEffectBundles. That is, authorizing data cannot exist without corresponding effecting data for a given bundle type.

Once a (bundleType, bundleVariant) pair is assigned for a given transaction version, its semantics are fixed for the lifetime of that transaction version. A subsequent network upgrade may define a new transaction version that reassigns identifiers or changes bundle semantics, but within a single transaction version, bundle type and variant identifiers have stable, unchanging meanings.

A new variant of an existing bundle type MUST affect the same value pool(s) as the original bundle type. This ensures that a client that does not recognize a particular bundleVariant can still determine which pool(s) are affected by the bundle and inform its user accordingly.

V7 Transaction Bundle Type Registry

The following (bundleType, bundleVariant) pairs are registered for the V7 transaction format. All currently-defined values are encoded as single-byte compactSize values where they appear in the transaction format.

The mValuePoolDeltas column indicates whether or not an entry for this bundle type MAY appear in mValuePoolDeltas. For rows where an ❌ is present, the value pool delta for every pool is guaranteed to be zero, and so entries in mValuePoolDeltas MUST NOT be present.

The mEffectBundles column indicates whether or not an entry for this bundle type MAY appear in mEffectBundles. For rows where an ❌ is present, the bundle has no effecting data, and so an entry in mEffectBundles MUST NOT be present.

The mAuthBundles column indicates whether or not an entry for this bundle type MAY appear in mAuthBundles. For rows where an ❌ is present, the bundle has no authorizing data, and so an entry in mAuthBundles MUST NOT be present.

BundleType BundleVariant mValuePoolDeltas mEffectBundles mAuthBundles Defining ZIP Bundle kind
0 0 This ZIP Transparent
1 0 This ZIP Coinbase
2 0 This ZIP Sapling
3 0 This ZIP Orchard
4 0 This ZIP Ironwood
5 0 ZIP 2002 Transaction fee
6 0 ZIP 233 ZIP 233 NSM field

Additional bundle types or variants MAY be added to this registry via modifications to this ZIP specified in other ZIPs. Such modifications MUST specify all of the information required by the Bundle Type Registration section above.

Potential Future Bundle Types

Click to show/hide

The following bundle kinds have no allocated (bundleType, bundleVariant) pair. Where a bundle type is given, the kind is a new variant of that existing type and only its variant identifier is unassigned. Those proposed by a ZIP name it; the rest are provided to illustrate how potential future upgrades might affect the bundle registry:

BundleType BundleVariant mValuePoolDeltas mEffectBundles mAuthBundles Defining ZIP Bundle kind
2 1 (provisional) ZIP 231 Sapling-post-ZIP 231
3 1 (provisional) ZIP 231 Orchard post-ZIP 231
3 2 (provisional) ZIP 226 OrchardZSA
4 1 (provisional) ZIP 231 Ironwood post-ZIP 231
0 ZIP 270 Key rotation
0 TBD Lockbox disbursement
0 ZIP 231 Memos
0 ZIP 227 ZSA Issuance
0 TZEs
0 Pool that only has a long-term storage protocol (PQ, very simple thus insulated from counterfeiting fears, can be used for payments but higher latency for that purpose)
0 Tachyon
0 Staking
0 Unstaking (if it can't be combined with the Staking bundle)
0 Post-quantum fast payment protocol

Transaction Format

Bytes Name Data Type Description
Common Transaction Fields
4 header uint32

Contains:

  • fOverwintered flag (bit 31, always set)
  • version (bits 30 .. 0) – transaction version.
4 nVersionGroupId uint32 Version group ID (nonzero).
4 nConsensusBranchId uint32 Consensus branch ID (nonzero).
4 lock_time uint32 Unix-epoch UTC time or block height, encoded as in Bitcoin.
4 nExpiryHeight uint32 A block height in the range {1 .. 499999999} after which the transaction will expire, or 0 to disable expiry. 7
Transaction transparent value pool balance map
varies nValuePoolDeltas compactSize Number of entries in the mValuePoolDeltas map.
varies mValuePoolDeltas ValuePoolDelta[nValuePoolDeltas] A map describing the change to the transparent value pool produced by each bundle. Only bundles that produces changes to the transparent value balance will have corresponding entries in this map. For bundles that have no data except for a value, such as the ZIP 233 amount, no additional bundle data will be present in the Bundles section.
Bundles
varies nEffectBundles compactSize Number of bundles in the transaction that have per-bundle data.
varies mEffectBundles BundleData[nEffectBundles] A map from bundle identifier to the effecting data of a bundle.
varies nAuthBundles compactSize Number of bundles in the transaction that have per-bundle data.
varies mAuthBundles BundleData[nAuthBundles] A map from bundle identifier to the authorizing data of a bundle.

mValuePoolDeltas is interpreted as a map keyed by the tuple \((\mathsf{BundleType}, \mathsf{AssetUuid})\kern-0.03em\textsf{.}\) Lookups in this map are denoted with the syntax \(\mathsf{mValuePoolDeltas}[(\mathsf{BundleType}, \mathsf{AssetUuid})].\) A lookup for a key that is not present yields 0, consistent with the requirement that a record having zero value is elided from the encoding.

mEffectBundles and mAuthBundles are interpreted as maps keyed by bundleType.

Encoding constraints on these maps (uniqueness, ordering, and cross-map consistency) are specified in Parsing Rules.

ValuePoolDelta

Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies bundleType compactSize An encoding of the bundle type identifier.
varies bundleVariant compactSize An encoding of the bundle variant identifier.
1 assetClass uint8 An asset class identifier. 0x00 for the ZEC asset, 0x01 for other assets.
one of {0, 64} assetUuid byte[0] or byte[64] If assetClass == 0, the zero-length byte array, otherwise a byte array containing a universally unique 64-byte identifier for the asset.
8 value nonzero int64 The net change to the transparent transaction value pool for the given asset, produced by the bundle with this bundle type identifier. This value MUST be nonzero; if a ValuePoolDelta record would have zero value, it MUST be elided from the encoding of mValuePoolDeltas instead.

Let \(\mathsf{Zec}\) be a distinguished value representing the ZEC asset. It is used as the asset identifier when \(\mathsf{assetClass} = 0\kern-0.03em\textsf{.}\)

Let \(\mathsf{AssetUuid}(\mathsf{d})\) be the asset indicated by the mValuePoolDeltas entry \(\mathsf{d}.\)

\(\mathsf{AssetUuid}(\mathsf{d}) = \begin{cases} \mathsf{Zec} & \text{if } \mathsf{d}.\mathsf{assetClass} = 0 \\ \mathsf{d}.\mathsf{assetUuid} & \text{if } \mathsf{d}.\mathsf{assetClass} = 1 \\ \bot & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}\)

\(\mathsf{AssetUuid}\) groups the entries of mValuePoolDeltas by asset. The values of the entries in each such group are required to sum to zero; this balance rule is specified in Cross-bundle and chain-context rules.

BundleData

Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies bundleType compactSize An encoding of the bundle type identifier.
varies bundleVariant compactSize An encoding of the bundle variant identifier.
varies nBundleDataLen compactSize The length of the vBundleData byte array.
varies vBundleData byte[nBundleDataLen] The effecting or authorizing data for the bundle, dependent upon whether the BundleData occurs in mEffectBundles or mAuthBundles.

Parsing Rules

The rules in this section are requirements on the byte encoding of a V7 transaction. A byte stream that violates any of these rules is not a well-formed V7 transaction and MUST be rejected by any parser, regardless of which bundle types the parser understands. Enforcement of these rules is what makes it safe for a wallet to parse, identify, and compute the transaction identifier for a transaction containing bundle types that the wallet does not itself implement.

  • Each of mValuePoolDeltas, mEffectBundles, and mAuthBundles MUST contain at most one entry per key, and the entries MUST be encoded in strictly increasing key order. For mValuePoolDeltas the key order is (bundleType, assetClass, assetUuid) compared lexicographically (with assetUuid compared as a byte string). For mEffectBundles and mAuthBundles the key order is bundleType.
  • Every ValuePoolDelta record MUST have a nonzero value field. A ValuePoolDelta record that would have value = 0 MUST be elided from the encoding of mValuePoolDeltas.
  • In every ValuePoolDelta record, assetUuid MUST be the zero-length byte array if assetClass = 0, and MUST be a 64-byte value if assetClass = 1. No other value of assetClass is permitted.
  • For each bundleType that appears in any of mValuePoolDeltas, mEffectBundles, or mAuthBundles, all entries for that bundleType across all three maps MUST encode the same bundleVariant. (This, combined with the constraint that each of mEffectBundles and mAuthBundles is keyed by bundleType, ensures that a transaction uses at most one variant of any given bundle type.)
  • For each bundleType that appears in mAuthBundles, a corresponding entry with the same bundleVariant MUST exist in mEffectBundles.
  • Within the encoding of any bundle's effecting and authorizing data, every per-element sequence in the authorizing data that is described as corresponding to a per-element sequence in the effecting data MUST have exactly the same length as that effecting-data sequence, and the element at each index in the authorizing-data sequence corresponds to the element at the same index in the effecting-data sequence. For the bundle types defined by this ZIP this requires:
    • vSpendProofsSapling and vSpendAuthSigsSapling each have nSpendsSapling elements;
    • vOutputProofsSapling has nOutputsSapling elements;
    • in each Orchard protocol bundle, vSpendAuthSigsOrchard has nActionsOrchard elements, and proofsOrchard aggregates exactly nActionsOrchard per-action proofs.

A wallet that successfully parses a V7 transaction under these rules is guaranteed to be able to compute the transaction identifier (given, for each bundle type it does not understand, the corresponding 32-byte bundle_effects_digest value as described in Implications for Wallets), and to enumerate the transparent value flows of the transaction at the granularity of bundle types.

Consensus Rules

This ZIP requires the following modifications to the consensus rules in the Zcash Protocol Specification. These rules are additional to the parsing rules above; a transaction that satisfies the parsing rules but violates any of these consensus rules is well-formed but invalid.

Let CoinbaseBundleId be the identifier of the coinbase bundle, and FeeBundleId be the identifier of the fee bundle. In V7 transactions, \(\mathsf{CoinbaseBundleId} = 1\) and \(\mathsf{FeeBundleId} = 5\) as defined in the table above.

Bundle-local rules

The following rules constrain the contents of individual bundles. A wallet or full validator only needs to enforce a given rule in this subsection if it understands the bundle type that the rule applies to.

  • A bundle type MUST NOT appear in any map for which the corresponding column of the V7 Transaction Bundle Type Registry is marked ❌, and MUST NOT appear in any map at all if its row in the registry is marked as Reserved.
  • The assetClass value for any entry in mValuePoolDeltas having bundleType = FeeBundleId MUST be 0 (fee amounts are denominated in ZEC and no other asset).
  • The assetClass value for any entry in mValuePoolDeltas having bundleType = CoinbaseBundleId MUST be 0 (the block subsidy is denominated in ZEC and no other asset). The same applies to the blockSubsidy and lockboxValue fields of its effecting data.
  • A coinbase transaction MUST NOT spend any transparent output. If a transparent bundle is present in a coinbase transaction, its effecting data MUST have tx_in_count = 0.
  • For coinbase transactions, the nSpendsSapling field of the Sapling bundle's effecting data MUST be 0.
  • For coinbase transactions, the enableSpends bit of the flagsOrchard field of every Orchard protocol bundle MUST be 0.
  • In an Orchard bundle, the enableCrossAddress bit of flagsOrchard MUST be 0; that is, transfers into the Orchard pool are restricted to the protocol-level address of the action's spend. 15 The bit is unrestricted in an Ironwood bundle.

Cross-bundle and chain-context rules

The following rules relate the contents of a bundle to the other bundles of its transaction, or to the block that contains it. They MUST be enforced by full validators.

  • For coinbase transactions, the value of \(\mathsf{mValuePoolDeltas}[(\mathsf{FeeBundleId}, \mathsf{Zec})]\) MUST be nonnegative. This represents the total transaction fees collected from all other transactions in the block.
  • For non-coinbase transactions, the value of \(\mathsf{mValuePoolDeltas}[(\mathsf{FeeBundleId}, \mathsf{Zec})]\) MUST be nonpositive. This represents the transaction fee paid by the transaction (expressed as a negative value, since it is removed from the transparent transaction value pool).
  • Within the scope of a block, the sum of the fee bundle values MUST equal 0. That is, the fees collected by the coinbase transaction MUST equal the sum of fees paid by all other transactions in the block.
  • Exactly one transaction in a block MUST be a coinbase transaction, and it MUST be the first transaction in the block.
  • The blockHeight field of the coinbase bundle's effecting data MUST equal the height of the block containing the transaction.
  • The blockSubsidy field of the coinbase bundle's effecting data MUST equal the block subsidy for that block, as defined in § 7.8 'Block Subsidy and Founders' Reward'. 5
  • The lockboxValue field of the coinbase bundle's effecting data MUST equal the total value that the funding streams for that block deposit into the deferred pool, as defined in § 7.10 'Payment of Funding Streams, Deferred Lockbox, and Lockbox Disbursement'. 6
  • The value of \(\mathsf{mValuePoolDeltas}[(\mathsf{CoinbaseBundleId}, \mathsf{Zec})]\) MUST equal the part of the block subsidy that is not deposited into the lockbox.
    \(\mathsf{mValuePoolDeltas}[(\mathsf{CoinbaseBundleId}, \mathsf{Zec})] = \mathsf{blockSubsidy} - \mathsf{lockboxValue}\)
  • For every transaction, the sum of value pool delta values in each asset MUST equal 0.
    \(\forall \mathsf{a}. \sum_{\mathsf{d} \in \mathsf{mValuePoolDeltas} | \mathsf{AssetUuid}(\mathsf{d}) = \mathsf{a}} \mathsf{d.value} = 0\)

Sighash Versioning

This ZIP introduces sighash algorithm versioning. Where previously each transaction version had a single associated sighash algorithm, going forward it is possible for signers to use any sighash algorithm within the closed set specified for a given transaction version (and made available in consensus via network upgrades).

The sighash version is encoded as a single byte alongside any associated data that the sighash algorithm version requires (for deterministically computing the digest):

sighashInfo = [sighashVersion] || associatedData

where associatedData is specific to the bundle it appears in.

Each bundle type defines the sighash algorithm versions available to its signers, the associatedData that each version requires, and the digest that a signature using it commits to. Those definitions are given for the bundle types registered by this ZIP in Bundle Definitions.

Version 0 is by convention the "commit to all effecting data" sighash algorithm. Other versions can commit to whatever makes sense for desired functionality within a given transaction version. Consensus rules choose the digest algorithm for each signer based on sighashVersion.

Sighash version information is present alongside each signature in the authorizing data of each bundle.

Digest Algorithms

All digests are personalized BLAKE2b-256 hashes. In cases where no elements are available for hashing (for example, if there are no transparent transaction inputs), a personalized hash of the empty byte array will be used. The personalization string therefore provides domain separation for the hashes of even empty data fields.

The notation BLAKE2b-256(personalization_string, []) is used to refer to hashes constructed in this manner.

TxId Digest

A new transaction digest algorithm is defined that constructs the identifier for a V7 transaction from a tree of hashes. The overall structure of the hash is as follows:

txid_digest
├── header_digest
├── value_pool_deltas_digest
└── effects_bundles_digest
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || transparent_effects_digest)
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || coinbase_effects_digest)
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || sapling_effects_digest)
    │   ├── sapling_spends_digest
    │   │   ├── sapling_spends_compact_digest
    │   │   └── sapling_spends_noncompact_digest
    │   └── sapling_outputs_digest
    │       ├── sapling_outputs_compact_digest
    │       ├── sapling_outputs_memos_digest
    │       └── sapling_outputs_noncompact_digest
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || orchard_effects_digest)
    │   ├── orchard_actions_compact_digest
    │   ├── orchard_actions_memos_digest
    │   └── orchard_actions_noncompact_digest
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || ironwood_effects_digest)
    │   ├── ironwood_actions_compact_digest
    │   ├── ironwood_actions_memos_digest
    │   └── ironwood_actions_noncompact_digest
    └─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || unknown_bundle_effects_digest) ...

Each node written as snake_case in this tree is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of its children, initialized with a personalization string specific to that branch of the tree. Nodes that are not themselves digests are written in camelCase. In the specification below, nodes of the tree are presented in depth-first order.

txid_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.1: header_digest             (32-byte hash output)
T.2: value_pool_deltas_digest  (32-byte hash output)
T.3: effects_bundles_digest    (32-byte hash output)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZcashTxHash_" || CONSENSUS_BRANCH_ID

ZcashTxHash_ has 1 underscore character.

As in ZIP 244 12, CONSENSUS_BRANCH_ID is the 4-byte little-endian encoding of the consensus branch ID for the epoch of the block containing the transaction.

T.1: header_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.1a: version             (4-byte little-endian version identifier including overwintered flag)
T.1b: nVersionGroupId    (4-byte little-endian version group identifier)
T.1c: nConsensusBranchId (4-byte little-endian consensus branch id)
T.1d: lock_time           (4-byte little-endian nLockTime value)
T.1e: nExpiryHeight       (4-byte little-endian block height)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdHeadersHash"
T.2: value_pool_deltas_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the concatenated encodings of all entries in mValuePoolDeltas, in transaction order. For each entry, the following values are concatenated:

T.2a: bundleType    (compactSize encoding)
T.2b: bundleVariant (compactSize encoding)
T.2c: assetClass    (1 byte)
T.2d: assetUuid     (0 or 64 bytes, depending on assetClass)
T.2e: value         (8-byte signed little-endian)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdVPDeltaHash"

In the case that the transaction has no value pool delta entries (which would only occur for transactions that have no effect on any value pool), value_pool_deltas_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdVPDeltaHash", [])
T.3: effects_bundles_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the concatenated tagged bundle effect digests for all bundles present in mEffectBundles, in transaction order. For each bundle, the following values are concatenated:

T.3a: bundleType            (compactSize encoding)
T.3b: bundleVariant         (compactSize encoding)
T.3c: bundle_effects_digest (32-byte hash output)

where bundle_effects_digest is the root hash of the bundle's effecting data tree, as defined for each bundle type in Bundle Definitions.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdEffBnd_Hash" (1 underscore character)

In the case that the transaction has no effect bundles, effects_bundles_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdEffBnd_Hash", [])

v0 Signature Digest

A new per-input transaction digest algorithm is defined that constructs a hash that may be signed by a transaction creator to commit to the effects of the transaction. This follows closely the algorithm from ZIP 244 12.

The digest algorithm used for a given signature is determined by the sighashVersion from the signer's sighashInfo, as specified in the Sighash Versioning section. For sighash version 0 (the only version currently defined for V7 transactions), the digest algorithm is as specified below. Future network upgrades may define additional sighash algorithm versions with divergent behavior.

For transactions that have no transparent inputs, the v0 signature digest is identical to the transaction identifier digest.

For transactions with transparent inputs, the signature digest replaces effects_bundles_digest with a signature_bundles_digest that incorporates hash_type-dependent transparent signing data:

signature_digest
├── header_digest
├── value_pool_deltas_digest
└── signature_bundles_digest
signature_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

S.1: header_digest             (32-byte hash output)
S.2: value_pool_deltas_digest  (32-byte hash output)
S.3: signature_bundles_digest  (32-byte hash output)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZcashTxHash_" || CONSENSUS_BRANCH_ID

This value has the same personalization as the transaction identifier digest, so that what is being signed in the case that there are no transparent inputs is exactly the transaction id.

S.3: signature_bundles_digest

If the transaction has no transparent inputs, signature_bundles_digest is identical to effects_bundles_digest.

Otherwise, signature_bundles_digest is constructed the same as effects_bundles_digest, except that transparent_effects_digest is replaced with transparent_sig_digest.

Authorizing Data Commitment

A transaction digest algorithm is defined that constructs a digest committing to the authorizing data of a transaction. The overall structure is:

auth_digest
└── auth_bundles_digest
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || transparent_auth_digest)
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || sapling_auth_digest)
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || orchard_auth_digest)
    ├─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || ironwood_auth_digest)
    └─ (bundle_type_id || bundle_variant || unknown_bundle_auth_digest) ...
auth_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following value:

A.1: auth_bundles_digest (32-byte hash output)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxAuthHash_" || CONSENSUS_BRANCH_ID

For transaction versions before V7, a placeholder value consisting of 32 bytes of 0xFF is used in place of the authorizing data commitment.

A.1: auth_bundles_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the concatenated tagged bundle auth digests for all bundles present in mAuthBundles, in transaction order. For each bundle, the following values are concatenated:

A.1a: bundleType          (compactSize encoding)
A.1b: bundleVariant       (compactSize encoding)
A.1c: bundle_auth_digest  (32-byte hash output)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxAuthBnd__Hash" (2 underscore characters)

In the case that the transaction has no auth bundles, auth_bundles_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxAuthBnd__Hash", [])

Implications for Wallets

Sending V7 transactions

All Zcash wallets SHOULD, without undue delay, switch to sending only V7 transactions once they are allowed on the network. This applies to all transactions regardless of whether they use new V7 features.

Support for receiving funds in V7 transactions

Zcash wallets MUST support parsing V7 transactions by the time they are allowed on the network.

Because the V7 transaction format uses a type-length-value encoding for bundles, a wallet is not required to understand the internal encoding of every bundle in order to parse a transaction. However, a wallet that encounters a bundle with an unrecognized bundleType SHOULD alert the user that the transaction contains components it does not understand. A wallet that encounters a bundle with a recognized bundleType but unrecognized bundleVariant SHOULD alert the user that the transaction affects a pool the wallet is aware of, but in a way the wallet does not fully understand.

For bundle types not understood by a wallet, the wallet can compute the transaction identifier so long as it has been provided with the 32-byte bundle_effects_digest value for each bundle that it does not understand. This enables partial verification of transactions containing unknown bundle types.

A wallet MUST NOT construct or sign a transaction containing a bundle type or variant that it does not fully understand.

Bundle Definitions

The sections above are independent of any particular bundle type. This section defines the bundle types that this ZIP registers: the encoding of their effecting and authorizing data, the sighash algorithm versions available to their signers, and their contributions to the digests defined in Digest Algorithms. A ZIP that registers a further bundle type defines the same things for it, as required by Bundle Type Registration.

Transparent Bundle

The transparent bundle's value pool delta in mValuePoolDeltas represents the net value flowing from the transparent inputs to the transparent outputs.

A full validator MUST verify that the ZEC value pool delta for bundleType = 0 equals the total value of the transparent inputs minus the total value of the transparent outputs. (The input values are not encoded in the transaction itself; they are obtained from the UTXOs being spent.)

This rule applies to coinbase transactions unchanged. A coinbase transaction has no transparent inputs, so its transparent value pool delta is the negation of the total value of its transparent outputs; the value that those outputs consume is contributed to the transparent transaction value pool by the coinbase bundle and the fee bundle.

Transparent Effecting Data

The effecting data for the transparent bundle describes the transparent inputs being spent and the transparent outputs being created.

Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies tx_in_count compactSize Number of transparent inputs.
varies tx_in_effecting TransparentInputEffecting[tx_in_count] Effecting data for each transparent input.
varies tx_out_count compactSize Number of transparent outputs.
varies tx_out TransparentOutput[tx_out_count] Transparent outputs.
TransparentInputEffecting
Bytes Name Data Type Description
32 prevout_hash byte[32] The transaction ID of the output being spent.
4 prevout_index uint32 The index of the output being spent within that transaction.
4 nSequence uint32 Sequence number, encoded as in Bitcoin.
TransparentOutput
Bytes Name Data Type Description
8 value int64 The value of the output in zatoshi.
varies scriptPubKeyLen compactSize Length of the scriptPubKey.
scriptPubKeyLen scriptPubKey byte[scriptPubKeyLen] The script that must be satisfied to spend this output.
Transparent Authorizing Data

The authorizing data for the transparent bundle contains the scripts that authorize spending of the referenced transparent inputs.

Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies tx_in_auth TransparentInputAuth[tx_in_count] Authorizing data for each transparent input. The number of entries MUST equal tx_in_count from the effecting data.
TransparentInputAuth
Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies sighashInfo TransparentSighashInfo The sighash version and associated information for this input, as defined in Transparent Sighash Information (``TransparentSighashInfo`)`_.
varies scriptSigLen compactSize Length of the scriptSig.
scriptSigLen scriptSig byte[scriptSigLen] The script satisfying the conditions of the referenced output's scriptPubKey.
Transparent Sighash Information (TransparentSighashInfo)
Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies sizeSighashInfo compactSize The size in bytes of sighashInfo.
sizeSighashInfo sighashInfo byte[sizeSighashInfo] The sighash version and associated information, as defined in Sighash Versioning.
Transparent Sighash Algorithms

For the transparent bundle at bundleVariant = 0, sighash version 0 is the only version defined, and its associatedData is the empty byte string. A signature made with it commits to the digest defined in S.3.0: transparent_sig_digest.

Transparent Digests
T.3.0: transparent_effects_digest

In the case that transparent inputs or outputs are present, the transparent effects digest is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.3.0a: prevouts_digest  (32-byte hash)
T.3.0b: sequence_digest  (32-byte hash)
T.3.0c: outputs_digest   (32-byte hash)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdTranspaHash"

In the case that the transaction has no transparent components, transparent_effects_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdTranspaHash", [])
T.3.0a: prevouts_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the field encoding of all (prevout_hash, prevout_index) pairs from the transparent effecting data.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdPrevoutHash"

In the case that the transaction has transparent outputs but no transparent inputs, prevouts_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdPrevoutHash", [])
T.3.0b: sequence_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the 32-bit little-endian representation of all nSequence field values from the transparent effecting data.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSequencHash"

In the case that the transaction has transparent outputs but no transparent inputs, sequence_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdSequencHash", [])
T.3.0c: outputs_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the concatenated field encodings of all transparent outputs. The field encoding of each output consists of the encoded output value (8-byte little endian) followed by the scriptPubKey byte array (with leading compactSize length).

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdOutputsHash"

In the case that the transaction has transparent inputs but no transparent outputs, outputs_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdOutputsHash", [])
S.3.0: transparent_sig_digest

This digest is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

S.3.0a: hash_type                (1 byte)
S.3.0b: prevouts_sig_digest      (32-byte hash)
S.3.0c: amounts_sig_digest       (32-byte hash)
S.3.0d: scriptpubkeys_sig_digest (32-byte hash)
S.3.0e: sequence_sig_digest      (32-byte hash)
S.3.0f: outputs_sig_digest       (32-byte hash)
S.3.0g: txin_sig_digest          (32-byte hash)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdTranspaHash"
S.3.0a: hash_type

An 8-bit unsigned value. The SIGHASH encodings from the legacy script system are used: one of SIGHASH_ALL (0x01), SIGHASH_NONE (0x02), or SIGHASH_SINGLE (0x03), optionally combined with SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY (0x80).

The following restrictions apply:

  • Using any undefined hash_type (not 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x81, 0x82, or 0x83) causes validation failure.
  • Using SIGHASH_SINGLE without a corresponding output at the same index causes validation failure.
S.3.0b: prevouts_sig_digest

If the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY flag is not set, identical to prevouts_digest (T.3.0a).

Otherwise:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdPrevoutHash", [])
S.3.0c: amounts_sig_digest

If the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY flag is not set, a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the concatenation of the 8-byte signed little-endian representations of all value fields for the coins spent by the transparent inputs to the transaction.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxTrAmountsHash"

If the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY flag is set:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxTrAmountsHash", [])
S.3.0d: scriptpubkeys_sig_digest

If the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY flag is not set, a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the concatenation of the field encodings (each including a leading compactSize) of all scriptPubKey fields for the coins spent by the transparent inputs.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxTrScriptsHash"

If the SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY flag is set:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxTrScriptsHash", [])
S.3.0e: sequence_sig_digest

Identical to sequence_digest (T.3.0b) regardless of hash_type.

S.3.0f: outputs_sig_digest

If the sighash type is neither SIGHASH_SINGLE nor SIGHASH_NONE, identical to outputs_digest (T.3.0c).

If the sighash type is SIGHASH_SINGLE and a transparent output exists at the same index as the input being signed, a hash of that output's encoding.

Otherwise:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdOutputsHash", [])
S.3.0g: txin_sig_digest

For signatures over a transparent input, a BLAKE2b-256 hash of:

S.3.0g.i:   prevout      (36 bytes: 32-byte hash + 4-byte index)
S.3.0g.ii:  value        (8-byte signed little-endian)
S.3.0g.iii: scriptPubKey (with compactSize length prefix)
S.3.0g.iv:  nSequence    (4-byte unsigned little-endian)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"Zcash___TxInHash" (3 underscores)

For signatures over a Sapling Spend or Orchard Action:

BLAKE2b-256("Zcash___TxInHash", [])
A.1.0: transparent_auth_digest

In the case that the transaction contains transparent inputs, this is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following concatenated values for each transparent input:

A.1.0a: TransparentSighashInfo (field encoding bytes)
A.1.0b: scriptSig              (field encoding bytes, with compactSize length prefix)

The field encoding of TransparentSighashInfo is defined in Transparent Sighash Information (``TransparentSighashInfo`)`_.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxAuthTransHash"

In the case that the transaction has no transparent inputs:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxAuthTransHash", [])

Coinbase Bundle

A transaction is a coinbase transaction if and only if mEffectBundles contains an entry with bundleType = 1. The coinbase bundle replaces the otherwise-unspendable transparent input that identified a coinbase transaction in previous transaction versions, and carries the block height that that input was required to encode.

The block subsidy is the whole of the new issuance for the block, which consensus splits between the miner, the funding streams that pay to an address, and the funding streams that deposit into the deferred pool (the "lockbox") 14. Only the part that is not deposited into the lockbox is paid out by this transaction, so the coinbase bundle's value pool delta in mValuePoolDeltas is the block subsidy less the lockbox deposit. The fees collected from the other transactions in the block are contributed separately, as the value pool delta of the fee bundle.

The bundle's own effecting data carries the two components, as blockSubsidy and lockboxValue, so that the split is recoverable from the transaction rather than only their difference.

The coinbase bundle has no authorizing data.

Coinbase Effecting Data
Bytes Name Data Type Description
4 blockHeight uint32 The height of the block in which the transaction is mined.
8 blockSubsidy uint64 The block subsidy for that block, in zatoshis.
8 lockboxValue uint64 The part of that block subsidy deposited into the lockbox, in zatoshis.
varies coinbaseDataLen compactSize Length of the coinbaseData byte array.
coinbaseDataLen coinbaseData byte[coinbaseDataLen] Data chosen by the miner. Consensus assigns no meaning to its contents.
  • blockHeight MUST be in the range {1 .. 499999999}.
  • lockboxValue MUST be in the range {0 .. blockSubsidy}.
  • coinbaseDataLen MUST be at most 94.
Coinbase Digests
T.3.1: coinbase_effects_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.3.1a: blockHeight   (4-byte little-endian block height)
T.3.1b: blockSubsidy  (8-byte unsigned little-endian)
T.3.1c: lockboxValue  (8-byte unsigned little-endian)
T.3.1d: coinbaseData  (byte array with leading ``compactSize`` length)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdCoinbasHash"

This digest is present only for coinbase transactions; a transaction that has no coinbase bundle contributes no entry for it to effects_bundles_digest.

Sapling Bundle

Sapling Effecting Data

The effecting data for the Sapling bundle describes the Sapling spends and outputs. Unlike the V5 transaction format defined in ZIP 225 9, the value balance is not included here; it appears in mValuePoolDeltas instead.

Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies nSpendsSapling compactSize Number of Sapling Spend descriptions.
96 * nSpendsSapling vSpendsSapling SaplingSpendEffecting[nSpendsSapling] Effecting data for each Sapling Spend.
varies nOutputsSapling compactSize Number of Sapling Output descriptions.
756 * nOutputsSapling vOutputsSapling SaplingOutput[nOutputsSapling] Sapling Output descriptions.

The anchor is not part of the effecting data; it appears in Sapling Authorizing Data.

SaplingSpendEffecting
Bytes Name Data Type Description
32 cv byte[32] A value commitment to the net value of the input note.
32 nullifier byte[32] The nullifier of the input note.
32 rk byte[32] The randomized validating key for this Spend.
SaplingOutput

This is identical to OutputDescriptionV5 as defined in ZIP 225 9.

Bytes Name Data Type Description
32 cv byte[32] A value commitment to the net value of the output note.
32 cmu byte[32] The \(u\!\) -coordinate of the note commitment for the output note.
32 ephemeralKey byte[32] An encoding of an ephemeral Jubjub public key.
580 encCiphertext byte[580] The encrypted contents of the note plaintext.
80 outCiphertext byte[80] The encrypted contents of the byte string created by concatenation of the transmission key with the ephemeral secret key.
Sapling Authorizing Data

The authorizing data for the Sapling bundle contains the proofs and signatures that authorize the spends and validate the outputs.

Bytes Name Data Type Description
32 anchorSapling byte[32] A root of the Sapling note commitment tree at some block height in the past.
192 * nSpendsSapling vSpendProofsSapling byte[192 * nSpendsSapling] Encodings of the zk-SNARK proofs for each Sapling Spend.
varies vSpendAuthSigsSapling SaplingSignature[nSpendsSapling] Authorizing signatures for each Sapling Spend.
192 * nOutputsSapling vOutputProofsSapling byte[192 * nOutputsSapling] Encodings of the zk-SNARK proofs for each Sapling Output.
varies bindingSigSapling SaplingSignature A Sapling binding signature on the SIGHASH transaction hash.
  • The field anchorSapling is present if and only if \(\mathtt{nSpendsSapling} > 0\kern-0.03em\textsf{.}\) A Sapling bundle with outputs but no spends references no anchor.
  • The values of nSpendsSapling and nOutputsSapling are not re-encoded in the authorizing data; they are taken from the corresponding effecting data.
  • The field bindingSigSapling is present if and only if \(\mathtt{nSpendsSapling} + \mathtt{nOutputsSapling} > 0\kern-0.03em\textsf{.}\)
Sapling Signature (SaplingSignature)
Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies sizeSighashInfo compactSize The size in bytes of sighashInfo.
sizeSighashInfo sighashInfo byte[sizeSighashInfo] The sighash version and associated information, as defined in Sighash Versioning.
64 signature byte[64] An encoding of a RedJubjub signature, which may be either a spendAuthSig or bindingSig depending on context.

The 1:1 correspondences between Sapling authorizing-data elements and the elements of the corresponding effecting data are required by the parsing rules in Parsing Rules.

Sapling Sighash Algorithms

For the Sapling bundle at bundleVariant = 0, sighash version 0 is the only version defined, and its associatedData is the empty byte string. A Sapling spendAuthSig or bindingSig made with it commits to the digest defined in v0 Signature Digest, computed with hash_type = SIGHASH_ALL (0x01).

Sapling Digests
T.3.2: sapling_effects_digest

In the case that Sapling spends or outputs are present, the Sapling effects digest is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.3.2a: sapling_spends_digest   (32-byte hash)
T.3.2b: sapling_outputs_digest  (32-byte hash)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSaplingH_v7"

Note that unlike ZIP 244, neither the value balance nor the anchor is included here. The value balance is committed via value_pool_deltas_digest, and the anchor via sapling_auth_digest; the personalization differs from ZIP 244's ZTxIdSaplingHash because what is directly hashed has changed.

In the case that the transaction has no Sapling spends or outputs, sapling_effects_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdSaplingH_v7", [])
T.3.2a: sapling_spends_digest

In the case that Sapling spends are present, this digest is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.3.2a.i:  sapling_spends_compact_digest    (32-byte hash)
T.3.2a.ii: sapling_spends_noncompact_digest (32-byte hash)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSSpendsHash"

In the case that the transaction has Sapling outputs but no Sapling spends, sapling_spends_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdSSpendsHash", [])
T.3.2a.i: sapling_spends_compact_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the field encoding of all nullifier field values of Sapling spends belonging to the transaction.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSSpendCHash"
T.3.2a.ii: sapling_spends_noncompact_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the non-nullifier information for all Sapling spends belonging to the transaction. For each spend, the following elements are included in the hash:

T.3.2a.ii.1: cv     (32 bytes)
T.3.2a.ii.2: anchor (32 bytes)
T.3.2a.ii.3: rk     (32 bytes)

The anchor is hashed for each spend (even though it is shared in the encoding).

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSSpendNHash"
T.3.2b: sapling_outputs_digest

In the case that Sapling outputs are present, this digest is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.3.2b.i:   sapling_outputs_compact_digest    (32-byte hash)
T.3.2b.ii:  sapling_outputs_memos_digest      (32-byte hash)
T.3.2b.iii: sapling_outputs_noncompact_digest (32-byte hash)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSOutputHash"

In the case that the transaction has Sapling spends but no Sapling outputs, sapling_outputs_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdSOutputHash", [])
T.3.2b.i: sapling_outputs_compact_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the subset of Sapling output information included in the ZIP 307 13 CompactBlock format for all Sapling outputs belonging to the transaction. For each output, the following elements are included:

T.3.2b.i.1: cmu                  (32 bytes)
T.3.2b.i.2: ephemeralKey         (32 bytes)
T.3.2b.i.3: encCiphertext[..52]  (first 52 bytes)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSOutC__Hash" (2 underscore characters)
T.3.2b.ii: sapling_outputs_memos_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the memo field data for all Sapling outputs belonging to the transaction. For each output:

T.3.2b.ii.1: encCiphertext[52..564] (512 bytes, encrypted memo)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSOutM__Hash" (2 underscore characters)
T.3.2b.iii: sapling_outputs_noncompact_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the remaining Sapling output information not included in the CompactBlock format. For each output:

T.3.2b.iii.1: cv                    (32 bytes)
T.3.2b.iii.2: encCiphertext[564..]  (post-memo AEAD tag, 16 bytes)
T.3.2b.iii.3: outCiphertext         (80 bytes)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdSOutN__Hash" (2 underscore characters)
A.1.2: sapling_auth_digest

In the case that Sapling spends or outputs are present, this is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following concatenated values:

A.1.2a: anchorSapling          (32 bytes, present iff nSpendsSapling > 0)
A.1.2b: vSpendProofsSapling    (192 bytes per spend)
A.1.2c: vSpendAuthSigsSapling  (SaplingSignature field encoding per spend)
A.1.2d: vOutputProofsSapling   (192 bytes per output)
A.1.2e: bindingSigSapling      (SaplingSignature field encoding)

The SaplingSignature field encoding is defined in Sapling Signature (``SaplingSignature`)`_ and includes sighashInfo.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxAuthSapliH_v7"

The personalization differs from ZIP 244's ZTxAuthSapliHash because this digest now also commits to the anchor.

In the case that the transaction has no Sapling spends or outputs:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxAuthSapliH_v7", [])

Orchard Protocol Bundles

The Orchard protocol supports two value pools, each with its own note commitment tree, nullifier set, and chain value pool balance. Each is acted upon by its own bundle type: the Orchard bundle, bundleType = 3, acts on the Orchard pool, and the Ironwood bundle, bundleType = 4, acts on the Ironwood pool.

Both bundle types use the encoding defined in this section. Where a field is described below as belonging to the bundle's pool, that pool is the Orchard pool for an Orchard bundle and the Ironwood pool for an Ironwood bundle.

The bits of flagsOrchard have the same meaning for both pools, and so are named without the Orchard suffix they carried in the V5 transaction format, following ZIP 229 10. Their values are constrained per pool by the Bundle-local rules.

Orchard Protocol Effecting Data

The effecting data for an Orchard protocol bundle describes the Orchard actions. Unlike the V5 transaction format defined in ZIP 225 9, the value balance is not included here; it appears in mValuePoolDeltas instead.

Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies nActionsOrchard compactSize The number of Orchard Action descriptions.
820 * nActionsOrchard vActionsOrchard OrchardActionEffecting[nActionsOrchard] Effecting data for each Orchard Action.
1 flagsOrchard byte

An 8-bit value representing a set of flags. Ordered from LSB to MSB:

  • enableSpends
  • enableOutputs
  • enableCrossAddress 15
  • The remaining bits are set to \(0\!\) .
  • The field flagsOrchard is present if and only if \(\mathtt{nActionsOrchard} > 0\kern-0.03em\textsf{.}\)

The anchor is not part of the effecting data; it appears in Orchard Protocol Authorizing Data.

OrchardActionEffecting
Bytes Name Data Type Description
32 cv byte[32] A value commitment to the net value of the input note minus the output note.
32 nullifier byte[32] The nullifier of the input note.
32 rk byte[32] The randomized validating key for this Action.
32 cmx byte[32] The \(x\!\) -coordinate of the note commitment for the output note.
32 ephemeralKey byte[32] An encoding of an ephemeral Pallas public key.
580 encCiphertext byte[580] The encrypted contents of the note plaintext.
80 outCiphertext byte[80] The encrypted contents of the byte string created by concatenation of the transmission key with the ephemeral secret key.
Orchard Protocol Authorizing Data

The authorizing data for an Orchard protocol bundle contains the proofs and signatures that authorize the actions.

Bytes Name Data Type Description
32 anchorOrchard byte[32] A root of the note commitment tree of the bundle's pool, at some block height in the past.
varies sizeProofsOrchard compactSize Length in bytes of proofsOrchard. Value is \(2720 + 2272 \cdot \mathtt{nActionsOrchard}\!\) .
sizeProofsOrchard proofsOrchard byte[sizeProofsOrchard] Encoding of aggregated zk-SNARK proofs for Orchard Actions.
varies vSpendAuthSigsOrchard OrchardSignature[nActionsOrchard] Authorizing signatures for each Orchard Action.
varies bindingSigOrchard OrchardSignature An Orchard binding signature on the SIGHASH transaction hash.
  • The value of nActionsOrchard is not re-encoded in the authorizing data; it is taken from the corresponding effecting data.
  • The fields anchorOrchard, sizeProofsOrchard, proofsOrchard, and bindingSigOrchard are present if and only if \(\mathtt{nActionsOrchard} > 0\kern-0.03em\textsf{.}\)
Orchard Signature (OrchardSignature)
Bytes Name Data Type Description
varies sizeSighashInfo compactSize The size in bytes of sighashInfo.
sizeSighashInfo sighashInfo byte[sizeSighashInfo] The sighash version and associated information, as defined in Sighash Versioning.
64 signature byte[64] An encoding of a RedPallas signature, which may be either a spendAuthSig or bindingSig depending on context.

The 1:1 correspondences between the authorizing-data elements of an Orchard protocol bundle and the elements of the corresponding effecting data are required by the parsing rules in Parsing Rules.

Orchard Protocol Sighash Algorithms

For the Orchard and Ironwood bundles at bundleVariant = 0, sighash version 0 is the only version defined, and its associatedData is the empty byte string. An Orchard spendAuthSig or bindingSig made with it commits to the digest defined in v0 Signature Digest, computed with hash_type = SIGHASH_ALL (0x01).

Orchard Protocol Digests
T.3.3: orchard_effects_digest

The digest defined here and in its child sections is the Orchard bundle's instance of a digest shape shared with the Ironwood bundle; T.3.4 gives the Ironwood instance.

In the case that Orchard actions are present, the Orchard effects digest is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following values:

T.3.3a: orchard_actions_compact_digest    (32-byte hash)
T.3.3b: orchard_actions_memos_digest      (32-byte hash)
T.3.3c: orchard_actions_noncompact_digest (32-byte hash)
T.3.3d: flagsOrchard                      (1 byte)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdOrchardH_v7"

Note that unlike ZIP 244, neither the value balance nor the anchor is included here. The value balance is committed via value_pool_deltas_digest, and the anchor via orchard_auth_digest; the personalization differs from ZIP 244's ZTxIdOrchardHash because what is directly hashed has changed.

In the case that the transaction has no Orchard actions, orchard_effects_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdOrchardH_v7", [])
T.3.3a: orchard_actions_compact_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the subset of Orchard action information intended for inclusion in the CompactBlock format. For each action:

T.3.3a.i:   nullifier            (32 bytes)
T.3.3a.ii:  cmx                  (32 bytes)
T.3.3a.iii: ephemeralKey         (32 bytes)
T.3.3a.iv:  encCiphertext[..52]  (first 52 bytes)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdOrcActCHash"
T.3.3b: orchard_actions_memos_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the memo field data for all Orchard actions. For each action:

T.3.3b.i: encCiphertext[52..564] (512 bytes, encrypted memo)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdOrcActMHash"
T.3.3c: orchard_actions_noncompact_digest

A BLAKE2b-256 hash of the remaining Orchard action information not intended for inclusion in the CompactBlock format. For each action:

T.3.3c.i:   cv                   (32 bytes)
T.3.3c.ii:  rk                   (32 bytes)
T.3.3c.iii: encCiphertext[564..] (post-memo AEAD tag, 16 bytes)
T.3.3c.iv:  outCiphertext        (80 bytes)

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxIdOrcActNHash"
T.3.4: ironwood_effects_digest

The Ironwood bundle uses the same effecting data encoding as the Orchard bundle, and ironwood_effects_digest is computed over that data exactly as orchard_effects_digest and its children are computed (T.3.3), except that each personalization string is replaced as follows:

Digest Orchard bundle Ironwood bundle
effects digest ZTxIdOrchardH_v7 ZTxIdIronwd_Hash
actions compact digest ZTxIdOrcActCHash ZTxIdIrnActCHash
actions memos digest ZTxIdOrcActMHash ZTxIdIrnActMHash
actions noncompact digest ZTxIdOrcActNHash ZTxIdIrnActNHash

The personalization strings differ so that the digest of a bundle acting on one pool cannot be reused as the digest of a bundle acting on the other.

In the case that the transaction has no Ironwood actions, ironwood_effects_digest is:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxIdIronwd_Hash", [])
A.1.3: orchard_auth_digest

In the case that Orchard actions are present, this is a BLAKE2b-256 hash of the following concatenated values:

A.1.3a: anchorOrchard         (32 bytes)
A.1.3b: proofsOrchard         (aggregated proofs)
A.1.3c: vSpendAuthSigsOrchard (OrchardSignature field encoding per action)
A.1.3d: bindingSigOrchard     (OrchardSignature field encoding)

The OrchardSignature field encoding is defined in Orchard Signature (``OrchardSignature`)`_ and includes sighashInfo.

The personalization field of this hash is set to:

"ZTxAuthOrchaH_v7"

The personalization differs from ZIP 244's ZTxAuthOrchaHash because this digest now also commits to the anchor.

In the case that the transaction has no Orchard actions:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxAuthOrchaH_v7", [])
A.1.4: ironwood_auth_digest

The Ironwood bundle uses the same authorizing data encoding as the Orchard bundle, and ironwood_auth_digest is computed over that data exactly as orchard_auth_digest (A.1.3), including its commitment to the anchor, except that the personalization field of the hash is set to:

"ZTxAuthIrnwdHash"

In the case that the transaction has no Ironwood actions:

BLAKE2b-256("ZTxAuthIrnwdHash", [])

Rationale

Effecting data bundles and authorizing data bundles are stored separately in the transaction format so that the authorizing data may be pruned by straightforward truncation of the encoded representation of the transaction.

Representing the coinbase as a bundle makes the value pool delta balance rule universal. Previously the coinbase transaction was the sole exception: its deltas summed to the negation of the block subsidy rather than to zero, because the subsidy entered the transparent transaction value pool implicitly. With the subsidy carried in the coinbase bundle's value pool delta, every transaction balances to zero in every asset, and a wallet can enumerate the value flows of a coinbase transaction using the same rule it applies to any other transaction.

Carrying blockSubsidy and lockboxValue in the effecting data states both components of the issuance in the bundle they belong to, and commits them to the transaction identifier along with the rest of that data. The value pool delta is their difference, so without them a client could see how much the coinbase pays out but not how much was issued or how much went to the lockbox. Deriving them instead is not open to every client: the subsidy is not a function of the block height alone once issuance depends on accumulated chain state, so evaluating the issuance schedule would require a client to track that state.

The Orchard and Ironwood bundles share one encoding because the Orchard pool and the Ironwood pool are two pools of the same shielded protocol. The action encoding, proving system, authorization, and note encryption are common to both; the pools differ in their note commitment trees, nullifier sets, and chain value pool balances.

Each pool gets its own bundle type rather than a variant of a single type because a variant is required to affect the same value pool(s) as the type it varies, so that a client encountering an unrecognized variant still knows which pools the bundle touches. Two pools therefore cannot share a bundle type, and separate types also keep the two value pool deltas separable, which a client needs in order to report the two chain value pool balances independently.

The Sapling and Orchard protocol anchors are authorizing data rather than effecting data, following ZIP 229 10. An anchor selects the note commitment tree state that the bundle's proofs are verified against, which is a property of how the spends are authorized rather than of what the transaction does. Placing it there lets a bundle be re-anchored to a more recent root without changing the transaction identifier, while the proofs still bind to the anchor actually used.

The coinbase bundle also gives the coinbase metadata a place of its own. In previous transaction versions that metadata was encoded as the scriptSig of a single transparent input whose previous output reference pointed at nothing, so a coinbase transaction had to be recognized by that unspendable reference, and the block height had to be encoded as a script push. The coinbase bundle encodes the height directly, and its presence identifies the transaction. The coinbaseData limit of 94 bytes holds the encoded size of that field to what the previous encoding spent on the same content. A coinbase scriptSig was limited to 100 bytes, of which the leading push of the block height took 5; of the 95 bytes that remained, the compactSize length prefix of coinbaseData now takes one.

Neither the previous output reference nor the sequence number of the input being replaced is carried over. Both were artifacts of encoding the coinbase metadata as a transparent input: the reference identified no output, and the sequence number had no effect on the validity of a transaction that spends nothing.

Deployment

Reference implementation

Open issues

Notes from design sessions

This section should be removed as soon as all the considerations described here are accounted for in ZIP.

Wallets or consensus-dependent applications that send transactions, might do something wrong that compromises user funds or privacy if they do not take into account consensus changes in an upgrade; therefore, only a subset of consensus changes can be safely adapted to using this mechanism.

In particular, consensus rules may change in such a way that a wallet doing what it has done in the past causes risk of loss of funds.

An example of this was ZIP 212 8. In that case the existing mechanisms failed to prevent loss of funds because in practice, wallets updated the consensus branch ID without updating note encryption. We made the mistake of requiring wallets to change their behaviour for an existing transaction version. Except for certain cases involving severe security flaws, we should avoid doing that again.

If a wallet needs to actively do something differently (for example, advertising addresses in a new format or creating an output with a TZE precondition) in order to be affected by a new feature, then it is reasonably safe for it to ignore the feature as long as it can still parse transactions and, and create and sign transactions that don't make use of those features.

It is okay that such a wallet might not be able to see funds that depend on new features, as long as they do not create such funds themselves.

Loss of funds is unacceptable. Temporary inaccessibility of funds in certain circumstances can be okay -- provided that this potential inaccessibility and the circumstances where it can occur is documented and an explicit design decision.

Strawman

Modify how we approach transaction format evolution, such that (after one more change to transaction encoding) it is possible for a wallet that has not adopted a parser for a given transaction format to continue to function after an additive change to the transaction format. Another way to state this is that we should make it possible to make "semver-compatible" transaction format changes.

  • @str4d: We could use a TLV approach where each "bundle" has a value balance. The NSM burn amount field could be its own bundle, the explicit fee data could be its own bundle and the consensus rule could be that all value balances sum to zero.
    • generically, you want a value balance vector, where you have zero or more value balances moving between bundles in other assets.
  • @nuttycom: You could have pre-ZSA and post-ZSA Orchard bundles.

Strawman II

Treat bundles as individually versioned.

  • Each bundle is registered with an ID relative to a tx version group ID.
  • The bundle ID encoding also has some flag bits indicating how it interacts with the tx as a whole.
  • Transactions then have two "bundle maps":
    • The first encodes how value moves between the different bundles.
    • The second encodes data specific to a bundle (e.g. how value moves within a bundle)
    • Bundles that don't have any data would just appear in the first map, and bundles that don't produce or consume value would just appear in the second map.
  • We can re-interpret various other facets of transactions as "bundles"
    • Explicit fees are a bundle that never produces value
    • NSM field similarly never produces value
    • ZSA burns would be split into "value balance out of Orchard pool" and "value balance being removed from ZSA issuance"
    • The coinbase subsidy is a bundle that only produces value; see Coinbase Bundle.
  • Privacy effect is minimal
    • We already follow a bundle approach with a transparent transaction value pool, for the turnstiles. This leans into it, while preserving the bundle boundary within which we implement each privacy protocol.
    • Some combinations of bundles would be permitted by the tx format that were not previously permitted.
      • However, we can still restrict which combinations of bundles can be mined in the consensus rules.

Sketch of the format:

  • Transaction version (like now)
    • Version
    • Version group ID
  • Transaction header
    • Expiry height etc
    • Likely need some kind of key-value map here to allow additional fields to be added, or maybe version the header to allow evolution?
  • Transparent transaction value pool "traffic map"
    • Option 1: BundleVariantID -> (valueBalance, AssetId -> valueBalance)
      • Key: Bundle variant ID
      • Value:
        • ZEC valueBalance
        • CompactSize len(generalizedValueBalances)
        • Zero or more generalized value balances
          • AssetId (not AssetBase because those are protocol-specific, and we want generalized value balances to be understandable independently of protocol changes)
          • valueBalance
    • Option 2: (BundleVariantID, Option[AssetId]) -> valueBalance
      • Key: Bundle variant ID encoded as u8 || { Option[AssetId] }
      • Value: valueBalance
    • Option 3: BundleVariantID -> Option[AssetId] -> valueBalance
      • Key: Bundle variant ID
      • Value:
        • Map containing one or more generalized value balances
          • { Option[AssetId] }
          • valueBalance
  • Sequence of bundles (maybe with a length prefix?)
    • Bundle variant ID
      • Maybe flag bits, either in the variant ID or next to it, that indicate how an opaquely-parsing wallet should interpret the bundle, e.g.:
        • A bit that says whether or not the bundle interacts with the transparent transaction value pool (which memo bundles would not have).
          • Counterpoint: The traffic map already specifies whether a given bundle does have an interaction with the transparent tx value pool for this tx. This is different from whether that kind of bundle can interact with the transparent tx value pool, but it the latter needed?
        • A bit that says whether the bundle has any other effect than what is specified in the traffic map.
          • Counterpoint: We should split apart effecting and authorizing data in the encoding, and then a bundle must be assumed effecting iff it has non-null effecting data.
    • CompactSize len(effectingData)
    • effectingData
    • CompactSize len(authorizingData)
    • authorizingData
      • effectingData and authorizingData would be opaque to the initial parser.
      • Parsers that support parsing (tx_version, bundle_version) know how to interpret its internals

Questions

  • Is it okay for fee calculations to be opaque to wallet parsers, as long as the fee amounts can be calculated in consensus?
    • Yes:
      • When receiving, all you care about is knowing the actual fee amount; you see that in the fee bundle's value balance.
      • When sending, you need to understand all bundles you are including, and then you can calculate the fee.
  • Can wallets still compute the txid and wtxid of an arbitrary transaction?
    • Yes, provided that effecting and authorizing data is separated. Then they can hash the effecting data even without understanding it to compute the txid, and they can hash the authorizing data even without understanding it to compute the authorizing data commitment part of the wtxid (ZIP 239 11).
    • However, this reintroduces a more direct linkage between the [w]txid computation and the transaction encoding. It's arguably fine, and potentially simpler -- since the [w]txid computation need not change at all for most protocol changes.
    • If the hashing uses flat hashes over the effectingData and authorizingData of each bundle (which it has to because the internal structure is not known), then it might be more difficult to do Merkle proofs over subsets of the data within a bundle. We haven't used that so far; is it really needed?
    • Should the authorizing data be entirely separate from the effecting data, and encoded at the end of the transaction in a batch, so that pruning is simply truncation?
  • The light wallet protocol will be updated to allow the client to specify the set of bundle types that the client understands. In the case that this information is provided, the light client server will then send the root hashes for each bundle type that the client does not understand when returning raw transaction data, so that the light client can correctly recompute and validate the txid; also, the compact transactions can be pruned to exclude bundles of bundle types. that the client will not understand.

TODO

Rename assetDigest to assetUuid in ZIP 227

References

1 Information on BCP 14 — "RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" and "RFC 8174: Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words
2 Zcash Protocol Specification, Version 2025.6.3 [NU6.1] or later
3 Zcash Protocol Specification, Version 2025.6.3 [NU6.1]. Section 3.3: The Block Chain
4 Zcash Protocol Specification, Version 2025.6.3 [NU6.1]. Section 3.12: Mainnet and Testnet
5 Zcash Protocol Specification, Version 2025.6.3 [NU6.1]. Section 7.8: Block Subsidy and Founders' Reward
6 Zcash Protocol Specification, Version 2025.6.3 [NU6.1]. Section 7.10: Payment of Funding Streams, Deferred Lockbox, and Lockbox Disbursement
7 ZIP 203: Transaction Expiry
8 ZIP 212: Allow Recipient to Derive Ephemeral Secret from Note Plaintext
9 ZIP 225: Version 5 Transaction Format
10 ZIP 229: Version 6 Transaction Format
11 ZIP 239: Relay of Version 5 Transactions
12 ZIP 244: Transaction Identifier Non-Malleability
13 ZIP 307: Light Client Protocol for Payment Detection
14 ZIP 2001: Lockbox Funding Streams
15 ZIP 2006: Restricting Transfers into the Orchard Pool